[MLA] MLA - wordpress (was airplay 2)

Bob Katz bobkatz at digido.com
Wed Jun 7 23:18:19 CEST 2017



On 6/6/17 1:18 PM, Kevin Gross wrote:
> The bigger picture here is that there is no comprehensive consensus on 
> target loudness. Eelco's recent research indicates -14 LUFS can work. 
> Bob's AES report recommends -16 to -20 LUFS. The EBU and ATSC 
> recommend -23 and -24 LUFS respectively.
>

Dear Kevin, it's important to know that the -14 LUFS for loudest track 
in an album is quite consistent with a -16 LUFS integrated loudness. So 
there is no serious discrepancy there. Eelco has studies of I think 50 
or more music pieces where the average for the album is at least 2 dB 
lower than the loudest track, or lower.

So this remains within the -16 through -20 LUFS recommendation of the 
subcommittee for integrated loudness.

I'll be proposing to the streaming loudness subcommittee that we revise 
the recommendation such that if album normalization is used (and 
recommended) that accepting a higher target than was used for track 
loudness would not be a discrepancy. We'll use Eelco's data as support.

Best wishes,


Bob
-- 

If you want good sound on your album, come to Bob Katz 407-831-0233 
DIGITAL DOMAIN MASTERING STUDIO Author: *Mastering Audio *Digital Domain 
Website <http://www.digido.com/> No trees were killed in the sending of 
this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly 
inconvenienced.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://grimmaudio.nl/pipermail/mla_grimmaudio.nl/attachments/20170607/20c27559/attachment.html>


More information about the MLA mailing list