[MLA] Not either or

Kevin Gross kevin.gross at avanw.com
Tue Dec 12 16:34:45 CET 2017


You've read Eelco's paper right? Aside from the fact that album worked best
subjectively for normal and corner cases, one practical issue is that if
you include an album/track option for users you should explain what it is
for. I'm curious what advice you would give to users on selecting mode. You
say track normalization is better in some cases. What cases are those
exactly?

Kevin Gross - AVA Networks

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Thomas Lund <thomas at lund.one> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have had some discussions after it became clear Tidal's system didn’t
> support Loudness-normalization based both on Track and Album; so they are
> stuck with the latter for now. If we jump to conclusions, more companies
> this group is used to advise, may find themselves taking one step forward
> and two backwards.
>
> For some applications, Track norm is better, for other applications Album
> norm should be preferred. It’s bad advice to impose an either/or decision,
> and in this case it might have ramifications for Tidal’s capability to
> comply with certain requirements or new track search criteria.
>
> Careful and unbiased guidance in these matters will better stand the test
> of time.
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> MLA mailing list
> MLA at grimmaudio.nl
> http://grimmaudio.nl/mailman/listinfo/mla_grimmaudio.nl
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://grimmaudio.nl/pipermail/mla_grimmaudio.nl/attachments/20171212/4e4a12b0/attachment.html>


More information about the MLA mailing list