[MLA] Tidal
Bob Katz
bobkatz24bit at gmail.com
Sun Oct 15 06:04:55 CEST 2017
This....
On 10/14/17 1:36 PM, Kevin Gross wrote:
> The question is, is there a way that the OS can mitigate the
> difference between normalization on and off?
is a VERY difficult question that we've all been wrestling with for
years. I predict that only a small percentage of users will complain.
Most of them will just turn their volume controls up a little and
cruise. So I would not suggest any kind of complex modification that
could become a real software nightmare --- and postpone the introduction
of normalization, which we do not want.
There are three classes of listeners who may complain after the switch:
1) Listeners who've been listening to soft material on European-weakened
mobile devices. Hopefully the -14 loudest song target for the loudest
song in album norm will give sufficient volume-control-room on mobile
devices. Thomas was the one to suggest the -14 target for album norm and
I bet he already thinks it would work for current European devices or he
would have put his foot down by now :-) Thomas?
2) Deaf listeners who like to listen to hard rock LOUD. Things will come
down a bit. But my experience with the iPhone at least shows there's
tons of room on the volume control on the American device.
So I think Tidal should stress the positive, as has been noted already
in this thread. They can say, "if you notice the volume has come down a
bit after this change, just turn your volume control up a bit and your
experience will be even better than before normalization."
3) *Attention Eelco: *Listeners who like to listen softly to background
music rather than foreground music, at low levels. They're looking for a
"processed, broadcast-style radio sound". THIS GROUP OF LISTENERS IS THE
REAL GOTCHA. That's because track normalization is a form of upward
compression: Soft songs are played louder than they are intended to be.
So it forms a kind of free compressor for people who are playing music
softly and not attentively. The only solution I think is to provide a
track normalization option for those listeners or a compression option.
Eelco, I think you should mentally prepare Tidal for this kind of
listener. But honestly, I don't think the kind of listener who
gravitates to Tidal is a background music listener so this may be more
of a problem for Spotify and Prodigy.... Tidal is a quality-oriented
service.
Hope this helps,
Bob
--
If you want good sound on your album, come to Bob Katz 407-831-0233
DIGITAL DOMAIN MASTERING STUDIO Author: *Mastering Audio *Digital Domain
Website <http://www.digido.com/> No trees were killed in the sending of
this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly
inconvenienced.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://grimmaudio.nl/pipermail/mla_grimmaudio.nl/attachments/20171015/ffc7c357/attachment.html>
More information about the MLA
mailing list