[MLA] More good news (Spotify)
Bob Katz
bobkatz24bit at gmail.com
Tue May 23 22:51:15 CEST 2017
Hey guys, I came up with that first: album normalization for everything.
I've argued for that from day one.
Bob K.
On 5/23/17 3:02 PM, Robert Ludwig wrote:
> Hi Eelco and Ian,
>
> This is all amazing. Using Album normalization for everything is
> something that just never occurred to me, thanks for out-of-the-box
> thinking, Eelco!
>
> Yes, I've know Buddy Judge pretty well for over 5 years now, we worked
> together during the “pre-release” stage of MFiT. I met him in person
> in California and he has always been very straight forward with me.
> I’m so glad to finally read SOME rationale for why Apple has not
> turned on Sound Check.
>
> I had two questions:
>
> 1. I agree that all services should use the same algorithm for
> normalization.
>
> Eelco, I’m not clear about this:
> VERY often we do a single that is being released _before_ the album is
> finished.
> How will the average album level be determined if there is no album
> with which to measure when the single is released?
>
> 2. Does Sound Check measure highly compressed music any better than
> BS1770 (I assume -4)? I’d be surprised if it did.
>
> That is mind-blowing that someone would put 20kHz tones into the music
> in order to make it louder.
>
> I’m very encouraged by all of this!
>
> All my best,
> Bob L.
>
>
>> Yesterday Buddy Judge, senior product manager at Apple and
>> responsible for iTunes, came to me after my presentation. We had a
>> beer and then we even went for dinner together ("all on Tim" :-).
>> Buddy is a cool guy and a musician (I guess Bob Ludwig knows him well
>> since he is also the guy behind "Mastered for iTunes"). Buddy told me
>> a few interesting things that may help us understand why
>> normalization was not turned on by default yet:
>> 1. The artistic integrity is very important for Apple. Just like
>> Tidal they do not like that with track normalization the loudness
>> integrity of an album is disturbed. Buddy told me it had never come
>> to his mind to advocate using album normalization even in shuffle
>> mode, but he found it an interesting concept that he would love to test.
>> 2. Buddy said that if normalization would be turned on by default,
>> all streaming services should use the same type of normalization so
>> mastering engineers can anticipate to it and would not have to make
>> seperate masters for every different platform (because many will
>> likely still aim for being the loudest). ITU BS1770 seemed to make
>> most sense to him, although he knew that compressed music is measured
>> a little too loud by BS1770. Album normalization with the loudest
>> track aligned to target level also made most sense (in my
>> presentation I showed that when normalizing the _average_ album level
>> (like currently in iTunes), the loudness of the loud hit tracks would
>> only be known when the full album is finished - this is a clear no-go
>> for a mastering engineer).
>>
>> We promised to stay in regular contact the next few months and all in
>> all this feels _very_ encouraging.
>>
>> But this brings me to an important note. Pop music mastering
>> engineers might even be worse than Italian commercial mix engineers.
>> So if the latter ingest 20 kHz tones just above the relative gate
>> threshold, to gain 1 or 2 dB of level, this will probably happen to
>> pop masters too. Florian, it will become even more important to
>> convince ITU to add the HF low pass filter to K weighting, so we
>> better make sure that this development is not delayed too much...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eelco
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLA mailing list
>> MLA at grimmaudio.nl <mailto:MLA at grimmaudio.nl>
>> http://grimmaudio.nl/mailman/listinfo/mla_grimmaudio.nl
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLA mailing list
> MLA at grimmaudio.nl
> http://grimmaudio.nl/mailman/listinfo/mla_grimmaudio.nl
--
If you want good sound on your album, come to Bob Katz 407-831-0233
DIGITAL DOMAIN MASTERING STUDIO Author: *Mastering Audio *Digital Domain
Website <http://www.digido.com/> No trees were killed in the sending of
this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly
inconvenienced.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://grimmaudio.nl/pipermail/mla_grimmaudio.nl/attachments/20170523/550e63d6/attachment.html>
More information about the MLA
mailing list