[MLA] ***SPAM*** Re: Not either or
Thomas Lund
thomas at lund.one
Thu Dec 14 07:33:03 CET 2017
Hi Ian,
You don’t know the per-track normalisation factor before an album is completed; and the factor changes if the same track, without remastering, becomes part of a new album.
“Hard-fought” was in relation to keeping a genre-neutral metrik at the center of all loudness measurement. Dolby wanted speech normalisation, and one-eyed Album is almost equally bad.
Satisfy Program Loudness normalisation first, then consider custom tunings such as Speech or Album.
cheers,
Thomas
> On 14 Dec 2017, at 02.14, Ian Shepherd <ian at mastering-media.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the extra details. Just to clarify:
>
>> b) Album reduces production transparency, a hard-fought feature of BS.1770
>
>
> Do you mean you’re concerned people won’t be able to predict the final playback loudness because it depends on the context within an album ? I’m not sure why this would be the case, since surely people will always know which other songs will be grouped together in an “album”, and so can calculate the offset themselves ?
>
> Sorry if I’m missing something,
>
> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> MLA mailing list
> MLA at grimmaudio.nl
> http://grimmaudio.nl/mailman/listinfo/mla_grimmaudio.nl
More information about the MLA
mailing list